For years, Google’s Performance Max (PMax) campaigns have been the ultimate “black box” for advertisers. Marketers would feed in assets, set their goals, and hope for the best-never really knowing where ads appeared, how budgets were allocated, or which creative assets were truly driving results. But that’s finally changing.

In a move that’s sent ripples through the PPC world, Google has announced a major overhaul to PMax reporting, promising new levels of transparency around channel performance, asset-level metrics, and search term insights. This will be rolled out in the next few weeks across all accounts.

At Stellar we got access back in February to a few accounts as part of their early BETA testing in the UK, so we've been familiar with the new system for a while. Let’s break down what’s new, why it matters, and where PMax still falls short.

What’s New in PMax Reporting?

1. Channel-Level Reporting: See Where Your Money Goes

The headline feature is channel-level reporting. For the first time, advertisers can see exactly how their PMax budget is distributed across Google’s platforms- Search, YouTube, Display, Discover, Gmail, and Maps. Key metrics like cost, impressions, clicks, and conversions are now broken down by channel, with interactive visualisations and downloadable data tables.

Why it matters:
No more guessing if YouTube is eating up your budget or if Search is driving conversions. Marketers can finally optimise assets for top-performing channels, diagnose performance drops, and launch targeted experiments with confidence.

2. Asset-Level Reporting: Real Numbers, Not Just Labels

Previously, PMax would label your assets as “best” or “low” performers-without any data to back it up. Now, asset-level reporting provides actual performance metrics (impressions, clicks, cost) for every headline, image, video, and description across PMax, Search, and Display campaigns.

Why it matters:
You can run real A/B tests, remove underperformers, and scale up winning creatives based on hard data-not just Google’s automated labels.

3. Search Term Reporting: Full Transparency at Last

Advertisers have long wanted to know which search queries were triggering their PMax ads. The new update delivers, with search term reporting now on par with standard Search campaigns. See the exact queries, match types, and campaign attribution.

Why it matters:
This empowers marketers to analyse intent trends, filter out irrelevant traffic, and build negative keyword lists to reduce wasted spend.

What Does This Mean for Advertisers?

Greater Transparency = Smarter Optimisation

With granular data on channel spend and asset performance, marketers can fine-tune their campaigns, allocate budgets more effectively, and justify decisions with real evidence.

Accountability and Data-Driven Creative Testing

If your cost per acquisition (CPA) spikes, you’ll know whether it’s due to YouTube or Search. If an asset underperforms, you’ll see it in the numbers and can take swift action.

More Informed Budget Allocation

Understanding how your ad dollars are split across Google’s ecosystem means you can prioritise spend based on actual ROI, not just hunches.

Where PMax Still Falls Short

While these updates are a big leap forward, the “black box” isn’t fully open yet. Key limitations remain:

• No Channel Control: You can see, but not control, where your budget goes. If YouTube is underperforming, you still can’t opt out.
• Display Network Lock-In: PMax automatically includes the Display Network, with no way to opt out or manage placement-level exclusions easily.
• Limited Placement Transparency: The new Placement Report shows where ads appeared but lacks performance metrics like clicks or conversions.
• Audience Signal Blind Spots: Marketers still can’t see how individual audience signals perform, making targeting more of a guess than a strategy.
• Asset Reporting Gaps: While you get impressions, clicks, and cost, you still can’t see which channels assets appeared on or tie conversions directly to specific assets.
• Opaque Attribution: PMax uses data-driven attribution by default, with no transparency or flexibility to use other models.

What Marketers Are Saying

The industry’s response is a mix of excitement and frustration. Many see the new reporting as a long-overdue step, but lament the lack of real control. As one marketer put it, “It’s like watching your house burn down through a window. Informative, but not helpful.” Others hope this is just the beginning, paving the way for even greater transparency and control in the future.

Final Thoughts: A Step in the Right Direction

After years of pressure, Google is finally letting marketers peek behind the PMax curtain. These new reporting features are a significant step toward smarter, more accountable, and more effective campaign management. But for PMax to truly earn the trust of performance marketers, Google will need to go further-offering deeper control, richer insights, and more flexibility.

‍