If you’re leading a modern marketing organisation, you’re likely feeling the tension between what you can track and what you actually need to know. Clicks and conversions still tell part of the story — but they fall short when you're trying to quantify the impact of YouTube campaigns, PR bursts, retail activations, or even sponsorships.

This is exactly where Marketing Mix Modelling (MMM) is regaining relevance. It’s not a legacy tool dusted off for lack of alternatives — it’s fast becoming the strategic framework for CMOs who need to understand true performance in a privacy-constrained, signal-fragmented landscape. At Stellar Search, we’re integrating MMM into our media planning and performance diagnostics for brands that demand more than channel-level metrics.

Why Are CMOs Returning to MMM?

Let’s be candid. Attribution is increasingly broken. The marketing ecosystem today is defined by:

• Cookie deprecation and tracking restrictions across browsers and devices
• Walled gardens (Meta, TikTok, YouTube) that restrict external visibility
• AI-led ad products (e.g. Performance Max, Advantage+) that obscure creative and audience-level reporting
• Inconsistent platform metrics that rarely align with business outcomes

In this context, MMM offers something most attribution systems cannot: a stable, channel-agnostic, privacy-safe way to measure marketing impact at a business level. It doesn’t rely on user-level tracking. It doesn’t need UTM tags or platform APIs. It uses your own historical business and media data to infer what’s truly moving the needle. For CMOs, this means MMM can help answer questions like:

• What is the marginal value of our YouTube investment vs. Meta?
• What’s the optimal media mix across awareness, performance, and retail channels?
• How much sales uplift can we attribute to brand campaigns — not just last-click tactics?

What Marketing Mix Modelling Actually Is

MMM is a form of time-series econometric modelling that estimates the contribution of each marketing and non-marketing factor on a business outcome — usually sales, revenue, or leads.

Rather than track individual user journeys, MMM ingests historical data — typically weekly or daily — and isolates the impact of each variable through regression analysis. These variables include media inputs (spend, impressions, GRPs), non-media factors (price, seasonality, promotions, competitor activity), and control variables (weather, holidays, etc.). Critically, modern MMM incorporates:

• Adstock decay: to model the lagged effect of upper-funnel media like TV or YouTube
• Saturation curves: to reflect diminishing returns at higher spend levels
• Bayesian priors or lift study calibrations: to refine estimates when first-party data is sparse

This makes it fundamentally different from last-click attribution. It’s not just tracking what’s clicked — it’s inferring what drove outcomes across time, regardless of whether the path was digital, offline, or blended.

Modern MMM Is Faster, Smarter, and More Agile

MMM has historically been slow, expensive, and vendor-locked. That’s no longer the case.

Thanks to the rise of open-source tools like Meta’s Robyn and Google’s Meridian, it’s now possible to build, run, and iterate MMM models internally — with transparency, speed, and customisability.

At Stellar Search, we use a modular approach. We begin with a proven open-source base and customise the model architecture to fit your business logic — whether that’s forecasting weekly subscription volume or modelling retail sell-through by region. We calibrate decay functions and saturation points based on empirical lift studies or real campaign performance. And we validate our outputs against out-of-sample holdouts to ensure reliability.

In many cases, we deliver the first round of MMM insights in less than four weeks — fast enough to inform quarterly budget decisions, and dynamic enough to run again mid-cycle.

What MMM Tells a CMO — and Why That Matters

The value of MMM isn’t just technical — it’s strategic. It equips you to:

• Quantify the incrementality of each channel — not just what worked, but what added value above baseline
• Make budget reallocation decisions confidently, based on modelled ROI, not platform-reported ROAS
• Justify brand investment to finance teams with evidence, not intuition
• Run scenario analysis: “If we reallocated £100K from Meta to YouTube, what change in sales could we expect?”
• Assess diminishing returns: “At what point does another £10K on Meta yield negligible additional lift?”

This moves the marketing conversation from reporting to planning. From inputs to outcomes. From campaign-level thinking to growth orchestration.

Where It Fits in a Modern Measurement Stack

We never suggest that MMM replace everything else. It works best as one part of a three-layered measurement framework:

1. Platform Attribution
   Useful for short-term campaign tweaks and creative testing.
2. Incrementality Testing (Geo, Lift, A/B)
   Ideal for validating specific hypotheses or isolated channels.
3. Marketing Mix Modelling
   Provides long-term, holistic understanding of channel contributions, base trends, and interactions.

Combined, these layers give you both precision and perspective — the ability to zoom in and step back.

‍